Business, law and broadcasting

The open library · Shelf

Court cases, federal rules and the business of broadcasting the game.

260 works · 24 to read here

Read here

The whole text on this site, word for word as the source printed it.

The whole shelf

Each one opens where it lives, in a new tab.

Find on this shelf

Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments RequestedFederal Communications Commission · 2007 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to (PRA) of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No. 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Subject to the PRA, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed collection of information is nece
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested" (2007). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Section 109 Report to CongressLibrary of Congress, Copyright Office, Library of Congress · 2007 · Federal document · Federal RegisterPursuant to statute, the Copyright Office is seeking comment on issues related to the operation of, and continued necessity for, the cable and satellite statutory licenses under the Copyright Act.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Library of Congress, Copyright Office, Library of Congress, "Section 109 Report to Congress" (2007). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Implementation of Section 207 of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004; Reciprocal Bargaining ObligationFederal Communications Commission · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this item, the Commission adopts final rules implementing Section 207 of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004. Because the Commission has in place existing rules governing good faith retransmission consent negotiations, we conclude that the most faithful and expeditious implementation of the amendments contemplated in the SHVERA is to extend to MVPDs the existing good faith bargaining obligation imposed on broadcasters under our rules. The item accordingly amends the Commission's rules to apply equally to broadcasters and MVPDs. We also conclude that the recip
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Implementation of Section 207 of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004; Reciprocal Bargaining Obligation" (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004; Implementation of Section 340 of the Communications Act; Report and OrderFederal Communications Commission · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this document, the Commission adopts final rules implementing section 202 of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 ("SHVERA"), which creates Section 340 of the Communications Act ("Act"), and amends the copyright laws in order to provide satellite carriers with the authority to offer Commission-determined "significantly-viewed" signals of out-of-market broadcast stations to subscribers. This document satisfies the statutory mandate to adopt rules for satellite carriage of significantly viewed signals by December 8, 2005.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004; Implementation of Section 340 of the Communications Act; Report and Order" (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Certain Rules on Competition in the Multichannel Video Programming Distribution MarketFederal Communications Commission · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document solicits public comment on the impact of certain provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Commission rules on competition in the multichannel video programming distribution market. The Commission is required by legislative mandate to submit a report to Congress based on the results of this inquiry no later than September 8, 2005.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Certain Rules on Competition in the Multichannel Video Programming Distribution Market" (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Public Information Collection Approved By the Office of Management and BudgetFederal Communications Commission · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) has received Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public information collection pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13, 109 Stat 163 (1995). An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid control number.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Public Information Collection Approved By the Office of Management and Budget" (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Request for Public CommentAntitrust Modernization Commission · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Antitrust Modernization Commission requests comments from the public regarding specific questions relating to the issues selected for Commission study.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Antitrust Modernization Commission, "Request for Public Comment" (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004Library of Congress, Copyright Office, Library of Congress · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is requesting information for the preparation of the first report to the Congress required by the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Library of Congress, Copyright Office, Library of Congress, "Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004" (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz BandFederal Communications Commission · 2004 · Federal document · Federal RegisterOn April 11, 2002, the Commission adopted rules to establish technical, service and licensing rules governing Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service (MVDDS) in the 12 GHz band. Because an error was made in the publication of the final rules, this document contains correcting amendments to the final rules that were published in the Federal Register. This document also updates Sec. 101.1417 to reflect the Commission's reorganization of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau in 2003.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service in the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band" (2004). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
List of Office of Management and Budget Approved Information Collection RequirementsFederal Communications Commission · 2004 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document revises the Commission's list of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved public information collection requirements with their associated OMB expiration dates. This list will provide the public with a current list of public information collection requirements approved by OMB and their associated control numbers and expiration dates as of February 29, 2004.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "List of Office of Management and Budget Approved Information Collection Requirements" (2004). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: Application of Network Non-Duplication, Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast SignalsFederal Communications Commission · 2003 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document announces the effective date of certain sections of the Commission's network non-duplication protection, syndicated exclusivity and sports blackout protection rules. Certain sections of the rule contained information collection requirements that required the approval of the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") before they could become effective. Those sections of the network non- duplication protection, syndicated exclusivity and sports blackout protection rules have been approved by OMB.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: Application of Network Non-Duplication, Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast Signals" (2003). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB for Review and ApprovalFederal Communications Commission · 2003 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commissions, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval" (2003). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: Application of Network Nonduplication, Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast Signals.Federal Communications Commission · 2002 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document revises regulations which the Commission adopted to implement certain aspects of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999. This document addresses petitions for reconsideration filed by the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, the National Basketball Association, the National Football League, the National Hockey League, and the Division 1-A Athletic Director's Association ("Sports Leagues") as well as by EchoStar Satellite Corporation ("EchoStar") and DirecTV, Inc. ("DirecTV"). The modifications to the regulations are largely technical and pertain to notifications of
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: Application of Network Nonduplication, Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast Signals." (2002). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications CommissionFederal Communications Commission · 2002 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a current valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control num
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission" (2002). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Order To Permit Operation of NGSO FSS Systems Co-Frequency With GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-Band Frequency Range; Authorize Subsidiary Terrestrial Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band by Direct Broadcast Satellite Licensees and Their Affiliates; and in Re Applications of Broadwave USA, PDC BroadbFederal Communications Commission · 2002 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this document, the Commission addresses petitions for reconsideration and establishes technical, service and licensing rules for Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service (MVDDS) in the 12 GHz band. MVDDS will facilitate the delivery of new communications services, such as video and broadband services, to a wide range of populations, including those that are unserved or underserved. These rules adopted will allow MVDDS licensees to share the 12 GHz band with new operators on a co-primary basis and on a co-primary, non-harmful interference basis with incumbent Direct Broadcast Satelli
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Order To Permit Operation of NGSO FSS Systems Co-Frequency With GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-Band Frequency Range; Authorize Subsidiary Terrestrial Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band by Direct Broadcast Satellite Licensees and Their Affiliates; and in Re Applications of Broadwave USA, PDC Broadb" (2002). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Carriage of Digital Television Broadcast SignalsFederal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document requests information concerning the issue of mandatory dual carriage. Specifically, the document seeks information to determine whether a cable operator will have the channel capacity to carry the digital television signal of a station, in addition to the analog signal of that same station, and without displacing other programming or services; whether market forces, through retransmission consent, will provide cable subscribers access to digital television signals and television stations' access to carriage on cable systems; and how the resolution of the carriage issues would imp
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Carriage of Digital Television Broadcast Signals" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
FCC To Hold Open Commission Meeting Thursday, January 11, 2001Federal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Commission will consider a Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration concerning rules requiring broadcasters and video programming distributors to provide video description and make emergency information more accessible to the visually impaired. 2...... Mass Media........... Title: Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television (MM Docket No. 00- 39). Summary: The Commission will consider issues regarding the conversion of broadcast television system from analog to digital, and DTV reception capability 3...... Cable Services....... Title:
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "FCC To Hold Open Commission Meeting Thursday, January 11, 2001" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
List of Office of Management and Budget Approved Information Collection RequirementsFederal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document revises the Commission's list of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved public information collection requirements with their associated OMB expiration dates. This list will provide the public with a current list of public information collection requirements approved by OMB and their associated control numbers and expiration dates as of July 31, 2001.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "List of Office of Management and Budget Approved Information Collection Requirements" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments RequestedFederal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control n
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB for Review and ApprovalFederal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commissions, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking ProceedingsFederal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal Register
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking Proceedings" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking ProceedingFederal Communications Commission · 2001 · Federal document · Federal Register
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding" (2001). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: Application of Network Nonduplication, Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast SignalsFederal Communications Commission · 2000 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThis document adopts regulations to implement certain aspects of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999, which was enacted on November 29, 1999. Among other things, the act authorizes satellite carriers to add more local and national broadcast programming to their offerings and seeks to place satellite carriers on an equal footing with cable operators with respect to availability of broadcast programming. This document adopts regulations that apply current cable rules for network non-duplication, syndicated program exclusivity and sports blackout to satellite carriers.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act of 1999: Application of Network Nonduplication, Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout Rules to Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast Signals" (2000). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Cable Act of 1992Must-Carry and Retransmission Consent ProvisionsFederal Communications Commission · 1994 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn response to petitions for reconsideration, and in order to complete the implementation of the must-carry and retransmission consent provisions of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and to clarify the obligations of cable operators and broadcasters, this Memorandum Opinion and Order amends the Commission's rules regarding must-carry and retransmission consent.
Read hereU.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, "Cable Act of 1992Must-Carry and Retransmission Consent Provisions" (1994). Federal Register. U.S. government work (Federal Register, 17 U.S.C. 105)
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Sports Broadcasting Practices and Marketplace Developments ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2026 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this document, the Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission seeks comments to enable the Commission to evaluate the sports media marketplace and how changes in the industry have impacted broadcasters and consumers.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Sports Broadcasting Practices and Marketplace Developments” (2026). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Non-concussive head impacts sustained during American football correlate with changes in gut microbiome diversity and composition ↗Pelland ZJ, Zafar A, Ay AA, Belanger KD. · 2026 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Pelland ZJ, Zafar A, Ay AA, Belanger KD., “Non-concussive head impacts sustained during American football correlate with changes in gut microbiome diversity and composition” (2026). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Security Zone; National Football League Draft, Ohio River, Allegheny River, Monongahela River, Pittsburgh PA ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2026 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for navigable waters near the confluence of the Ohio, Allegheny, and Monongahela Rivers. The security zone is needed to protect the public from potential threats related to the National Football League Draft, in Pittsburgh, PA. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Security Zone; National Football League Draft, Ohio River, Allegheny River, Monongahela River, Pittsburgh PA” (2026). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
College-to-NFL Stadium Turf Transitions as a Risk Factor for Lower Extremity Non-Contact Injuries in Rookie Players: A 13-Year Cohort Analysis ↗Adlou B, Grace J, Wilburn C, Weimar W. · 2025 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Adlou B, Grace J, Wilburn C, Weimar W., “College-to-NFL Stadium Turf Transitions as a Risk Factor for Lower Extremity Non-Contact Injuries in Rookie Players: A 13-Year Cohort Analysis” (2025). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024 · Court opinion · CourtListener95 F.4th 974
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan” (2024). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Statutory Cable, Satellite, and DART License Reporting Practices ↗Library of Congress, Copyright Office, Library of Congress · 2024 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe U.S. Copyright Office ("Office") is issuing a final rule governing royalty reporting practices of cable operators, and the Statement of Account form and filing requirements. This final rule makes regulatory changes regarding procedures for cable system operators. In some areas, similar changes are being made to the regulations governing statutory licenses for satellite carriers and digital audio recording devices or media.
U.S. government work
Credit
Library of Congress, Copyright Office, Library of Congress, “Statutory Cable, Satellite, and DART License Reporting Practices” (2024). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023 · Court opinion · CourtListener83 F.4th 423
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Cloud v. NFL Player Retirement Plan” (2023). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Decisions about College Football during Covid-19: An Ethical Analysis ↗Baugh CM, Glantz L, Mello MM. · 2023 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Baugh CM, Glantz L, Mello MM., “Decisions about College Football during Covid-19: An Ethical Analysis” (2023). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Jordyn Law (Army Black Knights football outside linebacker) kneeling during September 2, 2023 game against Louisisana–Monroe Warhawks game at Malone Stadium (53165133938) ↗United States Army photograph by Cdt. Noah Murray · 2023 · Picture · Wikimedia CommonsJordyn Law (Army Black Knights football outside linebacker) kneeling (in possible prayer) during September 2, 2023 game against Louisisana–Monroe Warhawks game at Malone Stadium
U.S. public domain
Credit
United States Army photograph by Cdt. Noah Murray, “Jordyn Law (Army Black Knights football outside linebacker) kneeling during September 2, 2023 game against Louisisana–Monroe Warhawks game at Malone Stadium (53165133938)” (2023). Wikimedia Commons. U.S. public domain.
Public domain in the U.S., as its source marks it. The licence or statement ↗
The Impact of Alcohol Sales in A College Football Stadium on Healthcare Utilization ↗Ruehlmann D, Halbur C, Moylan C, Georgakakos P, Negaard M, House H. · 2023 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Ruehlmann D, Halbur C, Moylan C, Georgakakos P, Negaard M, House H., “The Impact of Alcohol Sales in A College Football Stadium on Healthcare Utilization” (2023). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Association of National Football League Fan Attendance With County-Level COVID-19 Incidence in the 2020-2021 Season ↗Kurland J, Leal WE, Sorrell EM, Piquero NL. · 2022 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Kurland J, Leal WE, Sorrell EM, Piquero NL., “Association of National Football League Fan Attendance With County-Level COVID-19 Incidence in the 2020-2021 Season” (2022). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
City of Oakland v. The Oakland Raiders ↗California Court of Appeal · 2022 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
California Court of Appeal, “City of Oakland v. The Oakland Raiders” (2022). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
More Talent, More Leeway: Do Violence Against Women Arrests Really Hurt NFL Player Careers? ↗Sailofsky D. · 2022 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Sailofsky D., “More Talent, More Leeway: Do Violence Against Women Arrests Really Hurt NFL Player Careers?” (2022). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Perspective: National Football League Teams Need Chief Diversity Officers ↗DeMartini AL, Butler BN. · 2022 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
DeMartini AL, Butler BN., “Perspective: National Football League Teams Need Chief Diversity Officers” (2022). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Public health implications of opening National Football League stadiums during the COVID-19 pandemic ↗García Bulle B, Shen D, Shah D, Hosoi AE. · 2022 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
García Bulle B, Shen D, Shah D, Hosoi AE., “Public health implications of opening National Football League stadiums during the COVID-19 pandemic” (2022). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021 · Court opinion · CourtListener20 F.4th 441
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders” (2021). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
NCAA v. Alston ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 2021 · Supreme Court of the United StatesEducation-related athlete benefits and antitrust reasoning; historical decision, not a complete current NIL rulebook.
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “NCAA v. Alston” (2021). Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Security Zone; Cleveland Harbor, Cleveland, OH ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2021 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for navigable waters surrounding the Port of Cleveland, First Energy Stadium, The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and Voinovich Bicentennial Park from east of the Cuyahoga River entrance to west of the Voinovich Bicentennial Park and outward from shore, including inlets, to the navigation channel as marked by navigation buoys, but not including the channel. The security zone is needed to protect the public, participants, and spectators of the 2021 NFL Draft from terrorist and similar criminal acts, accidents, or other incidents detrimental
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Security Zone; Cleveland Harbor, Cleveland, OH” (2021). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Racial Bias in National Football League Officiating ↗Eiserloh DG, Foreman JJ, Heintz EC. · 2020 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Eiserloh DG, Foreman JJ, Heintz EC., “Racial Bias in National Football League Officiating” (2020). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
The impact of race relations on NFL attendance: An econometric analysis ↗Watanabe NM, Cunningham GB. · 2020 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Watanabe NM, Cunningham GB., “The impact of race relations on NFL attendance: An econometric analysis” (2020). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Jason McCourty 2019 (cropped) ↗AlexanderJonesi · 2019 · Picture · Wikimedia CommonsIn 2019
CC BY-SA 2.0
Credit
AlexanderJonesi, “Jason McCourty 2019 (cropped)” (2019). Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY-SA 2.0 licence: free to use with credit, and anything made from it is shared the same way. The licence or statement ↗
Keys v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Ret. Plan ↗District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019 · Court opinion · CourtListener387 F. Supp. 3d 1372
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, M.D. Florida, “Keys v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Ret. Plan” (2019). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Raymond J. Hamilton v. Pro-Football, Inc., t/a The Washington Redskins & Great Divide Insurance Co. ↗Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2019 · Court opinion · CourtListener823 S.E.2d 13, 69 Va. App. 718
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals of Virginia, “Raymond J. Hamilton v. Pro-Football, Inc., t/a The Washington Redskins & Great Divide Insurance Co.” (2019). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Tony Jones v. Pro-Football, Inc., t/a The Washington Redskins & Great Divide Insurance Co. ↗Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2019 · Court opinion · CourtListener823 S.E.2d 20, 69 Va. App. 732
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals of Virginia, “Tony Jones v. Pro-Football, Inc., t/a The Washington Redskins & Great Divide Insurance Co.” (2019). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates ↗Library of Congress, Copyright Royalty Board · 2018 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges) publish a final rule requiring affected cable systems to pay a separate per-telecast royalty (a Sports Surcharge) in addition to the other royalties that those cable systems must pay under Section 111 of the Copyright Act.
U.S. government work
Credit
Library of Congress, Copyright Royalty Board, “Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates” (2018). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Murphy v. NCAA ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 2018 · Supreme Court of the United StatesPASPA and federal anti-commandeering doctrine; historical basis for sports-wagering changes, not current state-law advice.
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “Murphy v. NCAA” (2018). Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
North American Football Fans Show Neurofunctional Differences in Response to Violence: Implications for Public Health and Policy ↗Daniel TA, Townsend KM, Wang Y, Martin DS, Katz JS, Deshpande G. · 2018 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Daniel TA, Townsend KM, Wang Y, Martin DS, Katz JS, Deshpande G., “North American Football Fans Show Neurofunctional Differences in Response to Violence: Implications for Public Health and Policy” (2018). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Richard Dent v. Nfl ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018 · Court opinion · CourtListener902 F.3d 1109
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Richard Dent v. Nfl” (2018). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates ↗Library of Congress, Copyright Royalty Board · 2017 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges) publish for comment proposed regulations to require covered cable systems to pay a separate per-telecast royalty (a Sports Surcharge) in addition to the other royalties that that cable system must pay under Section 111 of the Copyright Act.
U.S. government work
Credit
Library of Congress, Copyright Royalty Board, “Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates” (2017). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Alcohol and violence in 2017 National Football League Super Bowl commercials ↗MacLean SA, Basch CH, Garcia P. · 2017 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
MacLean SA, Basch CH, Garcia P., “Alcohol and violence in 2017 National Football League Super Bowl commercials” (2017). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Evans v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC ↗District Court, N.D. California · 2017 · Court opinion · CourtListener231 F. Supp. 3d 342, 2017 WL 467830, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15803
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. California, “Evans v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC” (2017). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Finkelman v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017 · Court opinion · CourtListener877 F.3d 504
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Finkelman v. National Football League” (2017). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Jesse Solomon v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement ↗Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017 · Court opinion · CourtListener860 F.3d 259, 2017 WL 2695191
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, “Jesse Solomon v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement” (2017). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Kelsey K. v. NFL Enterprises, LLC ↗District Court, N.D. California · 2017 · Court opinion · CourtListener254 F. Supp. 3d 1140, 2017 WL 2311312, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81503
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. California, “Kelsey K. v. NFL Enterprises, LLC” (2017). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Mitchell v. NFL Player Annuity Program ↗District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017 · Court opinion · CourtListener255 F. Supp. 3d 781, 2017 WL 2424218, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85519
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. Illinois, “Mitchell v. NFL Player Annuity Program” (2017). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Security Zone; Schuylkill River, Philadelphia, PA ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2017 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone on the waters of the Schuylkill River, Philadelphia, PA. This temporary security zone is intended to restrict vessels from portions of the Schuylkill River during the 2017 National Football League (NFL) Draft from April 27 through April 29, 2017. During the enforcement period, no unauthorized vessels or people will be permitted to enter or move within the security zone without permission from the Captain of the Port or designated representative. This security zone is necessary to provide security on navigable waters near the event.
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Security Zone; Schuylkill River, Philadelphia, PA” (2017). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
A Proposal to Address NFL Club Doctors’ Conflicts of Interest and to Promote Player Trust ↗Cohen IG, Lynch HF, Deubert CR. · 2016 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Cohen IG, Lynch HF, Deubert CR., “A Proposal to Address NFL Club Doctors’ Conflicts of Interest and to Promote Player Trust” (2016). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates ↗Library of Congress, Copyright Royalty Board · 2016 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges) publish for comment proposed regulations governing royalty rates and terms for the distant retransmission of over-the-air television and radio broadcast stations by cable television systems to their subscribers.
U.S. government work
Credit
Library of Congress, Copyright Royalty Board, “Adjustment of Cable Statutory License Royalty Rates” (2016). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Elite Rodeo Ass'n v. Professional Rodeo Cowboys Ass'n ↗District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016 · Court opinion · CourtListener159 F. Supp. 3d 738, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13353, 2016 WL 429886
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. Texas, “Elite Rodeo Ass'n v. Professional Rodeo Cowboys Ass'n” (2016). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Family fun or cultural free-for-all? A critique of the 2015 National Football League Super Bowl commercials ↗Basch CH, Kernan WD, Reeves R. · 2016 · Study · PubMed CentralStudy the specific governance, social or economic question; distinguish the authors’ argument and observational findings from established facts.
CC BY 4.0
Credit
Basch CH, Kernan WD, Reeves R., “Family fun or cultural free-for-all? A critique of the 2015 National Football League Super Bowl commercials” (2016). PubMed Central. CC BY 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 4.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Josh Finkelman v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016 · Court opinion · CourtListener810 F.3d 187, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 585, 2016 WL 158507
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Josh Finkelman v. National Football League” (2016). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League Management Council v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016 · Court opinion · CourtListener820 F.3d 527, 206 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3102, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7404, 2016 WL 1619883
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “National Football League Management Council v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (2016). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League Players Ass'n v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016 · Court opinion · CourtListener831 F.3d 985, 206 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3728, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14237, 2016 WL 4136958
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “National Football League Players Ass'n v. National Football League” (2016). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Champion Pro Consulting Group, LLC v. Impact Sports Football, LLC ↗District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015 · Court opinion · CourtListener116 F. Supp. 3d 644, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91598, 2015 WL 4392994
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, M.D. North Carolina, “Champion Pro Consulting Group, LLC v. Impact Sports Football, LLC” (2015). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
In re National Football League's "Sunday Ticket" Antitrust Litigation ↗United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015 · Court opinion · CourtListener148 F. Supp. 3d 1358, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166043, 2015 WL 8540953
U.S. government work
Credit
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, “In re National Football League's "Sunday Ticket" Antitrust Litigation” (2015). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
James Marshall v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “James Marshall v. National Football League” (2015). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Marshall v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015 · Court opinion · CourtListener787 F.3d 502, 2015 WL 2402355
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Marshall v. National Football League” (2015). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Television Market Modification; Statutory Implementation ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2015 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this document, the Commission proposes satellite television market modification rules to implement section 102 of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA) Reauthorization Act of 2014 ("STELAR"). The STELAR amended the Communications Act and the Copyright Act to give the Commission authority to modify a commercial television broadcast station's local television market for purposes of satellite carriage rights. In this document, the Commission proposes to revise the current cable market modification rule to apply also to satellite carriage, while adding provisions to addres
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Television Market Modification; Statutory Implementation” (2015). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Tynes v. Buccaneers Ltd. Partnership ↗District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015 · Court opinion · CourtListener134 F. Supp. 3d 1351, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128515, 2015 WL 5680135
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, M.D. Florida, “Tynes v. Buccaneers Ltd. Partnership” (2015). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
White v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015 · Court opinion · CourtListener129 F. Supp. 3d 683, 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1294, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119064, 2015 WL 5229386
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “White v. National Football League” (2015). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Atlanta Falcons Football Club, LLC; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment ↗Federal Trade Commission · 2014 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices. The attached Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent agreement-- that would settle these allegations.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Trade Commission, “Atlanta Falcons Football Club, LLC; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment” (2014). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Information Collections Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2014 · Federal document · Federal RegisterAs part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520), the Federal Communication Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden es
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Information Collections Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget” (2014). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
PDB Sports, Ltd., Doing Business as Denver Broncos Football Club; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment ↗Federal Trade Commission · 2014 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices. The attached Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent agreement-- that would settle these allegations.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Trade Commission, “PDB Sports, Ltd., Doing Business as Denver Broncos Football Club; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment” (2014). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Reggie White v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014 · Court opinion · CourtListener756 F.3d 585
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Reggie White v. National Football League” (2014). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Sports Blackout Rules ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2014 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this document, the Commission eliminates the sports blackout rules for cable operators, satellite carriers, and open video systems. Elimination of the sports blackout rules will remove unnecessary and outdated regulations and remove regulatory reinforcement (and the Commission's implicit endorsement) of the NFL's private blackout policy, which deprives consumers of the ability to view on television the teams that they have subsidized through publicly-funded stadiums and other tax benefits. Elimination of the sports blackout rules may not end all sports blackouts. To the extent that the NFL
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Sports Blackout Rules” (2014). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Sports Blackout Rules: Report and Order (FCC 14-141) ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2014 · FCCFederal sports-blackout regulation and its repeal; distinguish FCC rules from private league contracts.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Sports Blackout Rules: Report and Order (FCC 14-141)” (2014). FCC. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Sunshine Act Meeting; Open Commission Meeting; Tuesday, September 30, 2014 ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2014 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Commission will consider a Report and Order that would eliminate the Commission's sports blackout rules, which can prevent consumers from watching their teams' games on local television. 2................ INTERNATIONAL.......... TITLE: Comprehensive Review of Licensing and Operating Rules for Satellite Services (IB Docket No. 12- 267) SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to streamline and update Part 25 of the Commission's rules, which governs licensing and operation of space stations and earth stations for the provision of satellite communication s
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Sunshine Act Meeting; Open Commission Meeting; Tuesday, September 30, 2014” (2014). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Tennessee Football, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment ↗Federal Trade Commission · 2014 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices. The attached Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent agreement-- that would settle these allegations.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Trade Commission, “Tennessee Football, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment” (2014). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Turner v. National Football League ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014 · Court opinion · CourtListener301 F.R.D. 191, 2014 WL 3054250, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91534
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Turner v. National Football League” (2014). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Eller v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013 · Court opinion · CourtListener731 F.3d 752, 2013 WL 5302711, 197 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2001, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19440
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Eller v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (2013). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Information Collections Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2013 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, util
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Information Collections Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission” (2013). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League v. Fireman's Fund Insurance ↗California Court of Appeal · 2013 · Court opinion · CourtListener216 Cal. App. 4th 902, 157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 318, 78 Cal. Comp. Cases 605, 2013 WL 2316543, 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 414
U.S. government work
Credit
California Court of Appeal, “National Football League v. Fireman's Fund Insurance” (2013). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Otto Graham's Cleveland Browns Contract (11282103906) ↗Erik Drost · 2013 · Picture · Wikimedia CommonsOtto Graham's Cleveland Browns Contract
CC BY 2.0
Credit
Erik Drost, “Otto Graham's Cleveland Browns Contract (11282103906)” (2013). Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 2.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Otto Graham's Cleveland Browns Contract (11282138634) ↗Erik Drost · 2013 · Picture · Wikimedia CommonsOtto Graham's Cleveland Browns Contract
CC BY 2.0
Credit
Erik Drost, “Otto Graham's Cleveland Browns Contract (11282138634)” (2013). Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
Its maker shared it under the CC BY 2.0 licence: free to use with credit. The licence or statement ↗
Safety Zone; Woldenburg Park, Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2013 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Captain of the Port New Orleans, under the authority of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, has established a temporary safety zone on the Mississippi River in the vicinity of Woldenburg Park, mile marker 94 to mile marker 96, extending out 300 feet from the East Bank of the Mississippi River during Super Bowl 2013 celebratory events. The Super Bowl is a large scale event that poses many public safety concerns due to the number of people that will attend. This safety zone has been established to protect the public from the hazards created by congested river traffic.
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Safety Zone; Woldenburg Park, Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA” (2013). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Selected Laws Governing the Broadcast of Professional Sporting Events (R43096) ↗Congressional Research Service · 2013 · EveryCRSReportSports Broadcasting Act background, antitrust exemptions and historical blackout rules.
U.S. government work
Credit
Congressional Research Service, “Selected Laws Governing the Broadcast of Professional Sporting Events (R43096)” (2013). EveryCRSReport. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Atkins v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012 · Court opinion · CourtListener694 F.3d 557, 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1190, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19049, 2012 WL 3931010
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Atkins v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan” (2012). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brown v. NFL Players Ass'n ↗District Court, C.D. California · 2012 · Court opinion · CourtListener281 F.R.D. 437, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55221, 2012 WL 1057995
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, C.D. California, “Brown v. NFL Players Ass'n” (2012). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Eller v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012 · Court opinion · CourtListener872 F. Supp. 2d 823, 193 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3079, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74088, 2012 WL 1933746
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Eller v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (2012). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Giles v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗District Court, D. Maryland · 2012 · Court opinion · CourtListener925 F. Supp. 2d 700, 2012 WL 5882587, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166167
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Maryland, “Giles v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan” (2012). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Safety Zone; Woldenburg Park, Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2012 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Captain of the Port New Orleans, under the authority of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, intends to establish a temporary safety zone on the Mississippi River in the vicinity of Woldenburg Park, mile marker 94 to mile marker 96, extending out 300 feet from the East Bank of the Mississippi River during Super Bowl 2013 celebratory events. The Super Bowl is a large scale event that poses many public safety concerns due to the number of people that will attend. This safety zone would be established to protect the public from the hazards created by congested river traffic. This rule would be
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Safety Zone; Woldenburg Park, Mississippi River, New Orleans, LA” (2012). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Washington v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012 · Court opinion · CourtListener880 F. Supp. 2d 1004, 103 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1856, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89401, 2012 WL 3017961
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Washington v. National Football League” (2012). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Amendment of the Commission's Rules Related to Retransmission Consent ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2011 · Federal document · Federal RegisterIn this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) seeks comment on a series of proposals to streamline and clarify the Commission's rules concerning or affecting retransmission consent negotiations. The Commission believes that these rule changes could allow the market-based negotiations contemplated by the statute to proceed more smoothly, provide greater certainty to the negotiating parties, and help protect consumers.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Amendment of the Commission's Rules Related to Retransmission Consent” (2011). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Brady v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener779 F. Supp. 2d 1043, 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2952, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45511, 2011 WL 1578580
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Brady v. National Football League” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brady v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener779 F. Supp. 2d 992, 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2905, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44523, 2011 WL 1535240
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Brady v. National Football League” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brady v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener644 F.3d 661, 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3441, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14111
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Brady v. National Football League” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brady v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener640 F.3d 785, 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3094, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11355, 2011 WL 1843832
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Brady v. National Football League” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD. v. Newson ↗District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener783 F. Supp. 2d 769, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47379, 2011 WL 1671631
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, “MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD. v. Newson” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Morris v. National Football League Retirement Board ↗District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener833 F. Supp. 2d 1374, 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1161, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69379, 2011 WL 2580782
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. Florida, “Morris v. National Football League Retirement Board” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Comments Requested ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2011 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. Comments are requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) way
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Comments Requested” (2011). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Tom Brady v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Tom Brady v. National Football League” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
White v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011 · Court opinion · CourtListener766 F. Supp. 2d 941, 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2694, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20759, 2011 WL 706319
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “White v. National Football League” (2011). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 2010 · Court opinion · CourtListener176 L. Ed. 2d 947, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4166, 130 S. Ct. 2201, 560 U.S. 183
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League” (2010). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Needle, Inc. v. NFL ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 2010 · GovInfoLeague and team licensing arrangements; concerted action under antitrust law.
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “American Needle, Inc. v. NFL” (2010). GovInfo. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Givens v. TENNESSEE FOOTBALL, INC. ↗District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010 · Court opinion · CourtListener684 F. Supp. 2d 985, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11707, 2010 WL 517411
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, M.D. Tennessee, “Givens v. TENNESSEE FOOTBALL, INC.” (2010). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2010 · Federal document · Federal RegisterAs part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Federal Communications Commission invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on the following information collection(s). Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the qualit
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested” (2010). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
CBS Interactive Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009 · Court opinion · CourtListener259 F.R.D. 398, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36800, 2009 WL 1151982
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “CBS Interactive Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (2009). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Kevin Williams v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Kevin Williams v. National Football League” (2009). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Ledford v. New Orleans Saints ↗Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009 · Court opinion · CourtListener10 So. 3d 866, 2008 La.App. 4 Cir. 1307, 2009 La. App. LEXIS 621, 2009 WL 1153463
U.S. government work
Credit
Louisiana Court of Appeal, “Ledford v. New Orleans Saints” (2009). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Reggie White v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Reggie White v. National Football League” (2009). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
White v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009 · Court opinion · CourtListener585 F.3d 1129, 74 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1615, 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2526, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24594, 2009 WL 3735970
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “White v. National Football League” (2009). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Williams v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009 · Court opinion · CourtListener582 F.3d 863, 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3505, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20251, 2009 WL 2901928
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Williams v. National Football League” (2009). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Needle Inc. v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008 · Court opinion · CourtListener538 F.3d 736, 88 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1358, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17553, 2008 WL 3822782
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, “American Needle Inc. v. National Football League” (2008). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Needle, Incorporated v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, “American Needle, Incorporated v. National Football League” (2008). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval, Comments Requested ↗Federal Communications Commission · 2008 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval, Comments Requested” (2008). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
American Needle, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints ↗District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007 · Court opinion · CourtListener496 F. Supp. 2d 941, 2007 WL 2042764
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. Illinois, “American Needle, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints” (2007). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hamilton Cnty Bd v. Natl Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, “Hamilton Cnty Bd v. Natl Football League” (2007). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hamilton County Board of Commissioners v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007 · Court opinion · CourtListener491 F.3d 310, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 14363, 2007 WL 1745286
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, “Hamilton County Board of Commissioners v. National Football League” (2007). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Parrish v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗District Court, N.D. California · 2007 · Court opinion · CourtListener534 F. Supp. 2d 1081, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68355, 2007 WL 2601385
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. California, “Parrish v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (2007). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Washington v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007 · Court opinion · CourtListener504 F.3d 818, 41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2097
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Washington v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan” (2007). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Washington v. Bert bell/pete Rozelle Nfl Retirement Plan ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Washington v. Bert bell/pete Rozelle Nfl Retirement Plan” (2007). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Dombrowski v. New Orleans Saints ↗Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006 · Court opinion · CourtListener943 So. 2d 403, 2006 WL 2147243
U.S. government work
Credit
Louisiana Court of Appeal, “Dombrowski v. New Orleans Saints” (2006). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006 · Court opinion · CourtListener445 F. Supp. 2d 835, 2006 WL 314493
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. Ohio, “Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners v. National Football League” (2006). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hughes v. New Orleans Saints & LWCC ↗Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006 · Court opinion · CourtListener924 So. 2d 1086, 2006 La. App. LEXIS 374, 2006 WL 469378
U.S. government work
Credit
Louisiana Court of Appeal, “Hughes v. New Orleans Saints & LWCC” (2006). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Johnson v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006 · Court opinion · CourtListener408 F. Supp. 2d 807, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1366, 2006 WL 51134
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Johnson v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan” (2006). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League v. Vigilant Insurance ↗Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006 · Court opinion · CourtListener36 A.D.3d 207, 824 N.Y.S.2d 72
U.S. government work
Credit
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, “National Football League v. Vigilant Insurance” (2006). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Oakland Raiders v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc. ↗California Court of Appeal · 2006 · Court opinion · CourtListener51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 144, 144 Cal. App. 4th 1175, 2006 D.A.R. 15, 2006 Daily Journal DAR 15208, 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10620, 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1809
U.S. government work
Credit
California Court of Appeal, “Oakland Raiders v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc.” (2006). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Needle, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints ↗District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005 · Court opinion · CourtListener385 F. Supp. 2d 727, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18885, 2005 WL 1563165
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. Illinois, “American Needle, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints” (2005). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Regulated Navigation Areas, Security Zones, and Temporary Anchorage Areas; St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2005 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Coast Guard is establishing a series of temporary regulated navigation areas, security zones and temporary anchorage areas on the St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL, from Winter Point to the Intracoastal Waterway, for Super Bowl XXXIX activities and events. The river will be divided into two regulated navigation areas and four security zones in order to provide increased layered security in close proximity to the downtown area of the river. Additionally, the size of existing fixed security zones around docked cruise ships will be increased. Existing anchorage grounds will be modified and te
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Regulated Navigation Areas, Security Zones, and Temporary Anchorage Areas; St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL” (2005). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Schwartz v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005 · Court opinion · CourtListener362 F. Supp. 2d 574, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3964, 2005 WL 608192
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Schwartz v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.” (2005). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Warnock v. National Football League ↗District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005 · Court opinion · CourtListener356 F. Supp. 2d 535, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2130, 2005 WL 357572
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, “Warnock v. National Football League” (2005). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Clarett v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 2004 · Court opinion · CourtListener306 F. Supp. 2d 411, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2304, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1768, 2004 WL 245647
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “Clarett v. National Football League” (2004). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Maurice Clarett v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004 · Court opinion · CourtListener369 F.3d 124, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3185, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10171, 2004 WL 1146734
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “Maurice Clarett v. National Football League” (2004). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Regulated Navigation Areas, Security Zones, and Temporary Anchorage Areas; St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL ↗Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard · 2004 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Coast Guard proposes to establish a series of temporary regulated navigation areas, security zones and temporary anchorage areas on the St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL, from Winter Point to the Intracoastal Waterway, for Super Bowl XXXIX activities and events. The river will be divided into two regulated navigation areas and four security zones in order to provide increased layered security in close proximity to the downtown area of the river. Additionally, the size of existing fixed security zones around docked cruise ships will be increased. Existing anchorage grounds will be modified
U.S. government work
Credit
Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard, “Regulated Navigation Areas, Security Zones, and Temporary Anchorage Areas; St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL” (2004). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia ↗Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003 · Court opinion · CourtListener823 A.2d 108, 573 Pa. 189, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 669
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, “Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia” (2003). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Security Zone; Waters Adjacent to Embarcadero Park and Campbell Shipyard, San Diego, CA ↗Transportation Department, Coast Guard · 2003 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone in the waters adjacent to Embarcadero Park and Campbell Shipyard, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA. This temporary security zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the participants, spectators and users of the waterway during the National Football League Super Bowl XXXVII NFL Experience event. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within the security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.
U.S. government work
Credit
Transportation Department, Coast Guard, “Security Zone; Waters Adjacent to Embarcadero Park and Campbell Shipyard, San Diego, CA” (2003). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Alexander v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club LLC ↗Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002 · Court opinion · CourtListener649 N.W.2d 464, 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1814, 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1045, 2002 WL 1837926
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, “Alexander v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club LLC” (2002). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brown v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 2002 · Court opinion · CourtListener219 F. Supp. 2d 372, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2972, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4399, 2002 WL 417175
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “Brown v. National Football League” (2002). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Schwartz v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001 · Court opinion · CourtListener157 F. Supp. 2d 561, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12527, 2001 WL 964233
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Schwartz v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.” (2001). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
VKK Corp. v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001 · Court opinion · CourtListener244 F.3d 114, 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 162, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3885
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “VKK Corp. v. National Football League” (2001). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Vkk Corporation v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001 · Court opinion · CourtListener244 F.3d 114
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “Vkk Corporation v. National Football League” (2001). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Black v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 2000 · Court opinion · CourtListener87 F. Supp. 2d 1, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2566, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2729, 2000 WL 266476
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Black v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (2000). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Green v. New Orleans Saints ↗Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000 · Court opinion · CourtListener781 So. 2d 1199, 2000 La. LEXIS 2992, 2000 WL 1702353
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of Louisiana, “Green v. New Orleans Saints” (2000). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Jerich v. New Orleans Saints ↗Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000 · Court opinion · CourtListener776 So. 2d 1283, 2000 WL 1874076
U.S. government work
Credit
Louisiana Court of Appeal, “Jerich v. New Orleans Saints” (2000). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Weber v. National Football League ↗District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000 · Court opinion · CourtListener112 F. Supp. 2d 667, 56 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1521, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13179, 2000 WL 1277812
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. Ohio, “Weber v. National Football League” (2000). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Charles Shaw v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999 · Court opinion · CourtListener172 F.3d 299, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6374
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Charles Shaw v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.” (1999). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Dial v. NFL Player Supplemental Disability Plan ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999 · Court opinion · CourtListener174 F.3d 606, 23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1590, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8699, 1999 WL 284962
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Dial v. NFL Player Supplemental Disability Plan” (1999). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23953q Gilbert "Buddy" Dial, Plaintiff/counter v. Nfl Player Supplemental Disability Plan, Defendant/counterclaimant/third-Party v. Janice Marye, Third-Party ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999 · Court opinion · CourtListener174 F.3d 606
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23953q Gilbert "Buddy" Dial, Plaintiff/counter v. Nfl Player Supplemental Disability Plan, Defendant/counterclaimant/third-Party v. Janice Marye, Third-Party” (1999). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
VKK Corp. v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1999 · Court opinion · CourtListener187 F.R.D. 498, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9383, 1999 WL 432557
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “VKK Corp. v. National Football League” (1999). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League Properties, Inc. v. Prostyle, Inc. ↗District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998 · Court opinion · CourtListener16 F. Supp. 2d 1012, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11848, 1998 WL 433903
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin, “National Football League Properties, Inc. v. Prostyle, Inc.” (1998). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998 · Court opinion · CourtListener154 F.3d 851
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission v. National Football League” (1998). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Houston Oilers, Inc. v. Harris County, Tex. ↗District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997 · Court opinion · CourtListener960 F. Supp. 1202, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5156, 1997 WL 183808
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. Texas, “Houston Oilers, Inc. v. Harris County, Tex.” (1997). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
St. Louis Convention and Visitors Com'n v. NFL ↗District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997 · Court opinion · CourtListener46 F. Supp. 2d 1058, 1997 WL 1106574
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Missouri, “St. Louis Convention and Visitors Com'n v. NFL” (1997). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Sweeney v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan ↗District Court, S.D. California · 1997 · Court opinion · CourtListener961 F. Supp. 1381, 97 Daily Journal DAR 13757, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5469, 1997 WL 202921
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. California, “Sweeney v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan” (1997). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brown v. Pro Football, Inc. ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 1996 · GovInfoCollective bargaining and the nonstatutory labor exemption.
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.” (1996). GovInfo. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Sherman Smith Tracy Smith v. Houston Oilers, Inc., Doing Business as the Houston Oilers Floyd Reese Steve Watterson ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996 · Court opinion · CourtListener87 F.3d 717, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2645, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15755, 1996 WL 361329
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Sherman Smith Tracy Smith v. Houston Oilers, Inc., Doing Business as the Houston Oilers Floyd Reese Steve Watterson” (1996). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Smith v. Houston Oilers Inc. ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Smith v. Houston Oilers Inc.” (1996). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brown v. Pro Football, Inc. ↗Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995 · Court opinion · CourtListener50 F.3d 1041, 311 U.S. App. D.C. 89
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, “Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.” (1995). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Reggie White Michael Buck Hardy Nickerson Vann McElroy Dave Duerson, Byron Evans, Objector-Appellant v. National Football League the Five Smiths, Inc. Buffalo Bills, Inc. Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. Cleveland Browns, Inc. The Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. Pdb Spor ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995 · Court opinion · CourtListener41 F.3d 402
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Reggie White Michael Buck Hardy Nickerson Vann McElroy Dave Duerson, Byron Evans, Objector-Appellant v. National Football League the Five Smiths, Inc. Buffalo Bills, Inc. Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. Cleveland Browns, Inc. The Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. Pdb Spor” (1995). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Special Event Tours ↗Transportation Department, · 1994 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Department seeks comment on a proposal to expand its rules on Super Bowl tours to cover air tours to other types of special events. These Super Bowl rules require that operators of Super Bowl tours that are promoted as including game tickets must have those game tickets in hand or under contract before they advertise or sell the tours, and that they must refund the entire tour price to any customer who does not receive a promised game ticket. This proposed rule would also extend the charter rule's prohibition on last-minute price increases to non-charter tours to special events. This initi
U.S. government work
Credit
Transportation Department,, “Special Event Tours” (1994). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Sports Programming Migration ↗Federal Communications Commission · 1994 · Federal document · Federal RegisterThe Final Report of the FCC's sports migration inquiry finds that there has not been significant migration of sports programming from broadcast to subscription media, but expresses concern about a decline in broadcast coverage of college football games in some markets. In the Final Report, the Commission states its intention to monitor sports programming availability and to act promptly, consistent with its statutory authority, should any significant threat to that availability develop.
U.S. government work
Credit
Federal Communications Commission, “Sports Programming Migration” (1994). Federal Register. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Sullivan v. National Football ↗Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994 · Court opinion · CourtListener
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, “Sullivan v. National Football” (1994). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
White v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994 · Court opinion · CourtListener41 F.3d 402, 1994 WL 680414
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “White v. National Football League” (1994). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
William H. Sullivan II v. National Football League, & Members of the National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994 · Court opinion · CourtListener34 F.3d 1091
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, “William H. Sullivan II v. National Football League, & Members of the National Football League” (1994). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
White v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993 · Court opinion · CourtListener836 F. Supp. 1458, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3038, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14570, 1993 WL 475473
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “White v. National Football League” (1993). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Five Smiths, Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'n ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992 · Court opinion · CourtListener788 F. Supp. 1042, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4625, 1992 WL 67284
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Five Smiths, Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'n” (1992). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Jackson v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992 · Court opinion · CourtListener802 F. Supp. 226, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15224, 1992 WL 246612
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Jackson v. National Football League” (1992). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Lewis v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992 · Court opinion · CourtListener146 F.R.D. 5, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16892, 1992 WL 437937
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, “Lewis v. National Football League” (1992). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
McNeil v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992 · Court opinion · CourtListener790 F. Supp. 871, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5570, 1992 WL 76874
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “McNeil v. National Football League” (1992). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brown v. Pro Football, Inc. ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 1991 · Court opinion · CourtListener782 F. Supp. 125, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20989, 1991 WL 303311
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.” (1991). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hebert v. Los Angeles Raiders, Ltd. ↗California Court of Appeal · 1991 · Court opinion · CourtListener23 Cal. App. 4th 414, 29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 540, 91 Daily Journal DAR 11438, 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1067
U.S. government work
Credit
California Court of Appeal, “Hebert v. Los Angeles Raiders, Ltd.” (1991). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Powell v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991 · Court opinion · CourtListener139 F.R.D. 381, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16502, 1991 WL 235314
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Powell v. National Football League” (1991). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Pro-Football, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services ↗District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991 · Court opinion · CourtListener588 A.2d 275, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 68, 1991 WL 41944
U.S. government work
Credit
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, “Pro-Football, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services” (1991). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Marvin Powell v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990 · Court opinion · CourtListener888 F.2d 559
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Marvin Powell v. National Football League” (1990). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Powell v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989 · Court opinion · CourtListener888 F.2d 559, 1989 WL 129171
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Powell v. National Football League” (1989). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
United States Football League v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989 · Court opinion · CourtListener887 F.2d 408, 1989 WL 119195
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “United States Football League v. National Football League” (1989). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Powell v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988 · Court opinion · CourtListener690 F. Supp. 812, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3119, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7859, 1988 WL 76633
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Powell v. National Football League” (1988). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
United States Football League v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988 · Court opinion · CourtListener842 F.2d 1335, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 19313
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “United States Football League v. National Football League” (1988). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
United States Football League v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988 · Court opinion · CourtListener842 F.2d 1335
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “United States Football League v. National Football League” (1988). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Armstrong v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan & Trust Agreement ↗District Court, D. Colorado · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener646 F. Supp. 1094, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18162
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Colorado, “Armstrong v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan & Trust Agreement” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. v. the College Football Ass'n ↗District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener637 F. Supp. 1289, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27916
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma, “Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. v. the College Football Ass'n” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Coggins v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc. ↗Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener492 N.E.2d 1112, 397 Mass. 525
U.S. government work
Credit
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, “Coggins v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc.” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
League v. Natl. Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener110 F.R.D. 521, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26097
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “League v. Natl. Football League” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener791 F.2d 1356
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Baltimore Football Club, Inc. (Baltimore Colts), Buffalo Bills, Inc., Chargers Football Co. (San Diego Chargers), Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Cleveland Browns, Inc., ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener791 F.2d 1356, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26184
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Baltimore Football Club, Inc. (Baltimore Colts), Buffalo Bills, Inc., Chargers Football Co. (San Diego Chargers), Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc., Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., Cleveland Browns, Inc.,” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Mayor of Baltimore v. Baltimore Football Club Inc. ↗District Court, D. Maryland · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener624 F. Supp. 278
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Maryland, “Mayor of Baltimore v. Baltimore Football Club Inc.” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
United States Football League v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener634 F. Supp. 1155, 1 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,074, 54 U.S.L.W. 2598, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26345
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “United States Football League v. National Football League” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Zimmerman v. National Football League ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 1986 · Court opinion · CourtListener632 F. Supp. 398, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27525
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Zimmerman v. National Football League” (1986). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Baltimore Football Club, Inc. v. Superior Court ↗California Court of Appeal · 1985 · Court opinion · CourtListener171 Cal. App. 3d 352, 215 Cal. Rptr. 323, 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2419
U.S. government work
Credit
California Court of Appeal, “Baltimore Football Club, Inc. v. Superior Court” (1985). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
United States Football League v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1985 · Court opinion · CourtListener605 F. Supp. 1448, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21034, 53 U.S.L.W. 2522
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “United States Football League v. National Football League” (1985). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, and Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion County ↗Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984 · Court opinion · CourtListener741 F.2d 954, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19660
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, “Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, and Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion County” (1984). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984 · Court opinion · CourtListener726 F.2d 1381
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League” (1984). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Highwood Service, Inc., Empire Sports, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, I ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984 · Court opinion · CourtListener726 F.2d 1381, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25064
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Highwood Service, Inc., Empire Sports, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, I” (1984). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 1984 · GovInfoCollege-football television restrictions and antitrust history.
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma” (1984). GovInfo. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Colorado High School Activities Ass'n v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener711 F.2d 943, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26122
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, “Colorado High School Activities Ass'n v. National Football League” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Colorado High School Activities Association v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener711 F.2d 943
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, “Colorado High School Activities Association v. National Football League” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener720 F.2d 772
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League v. North American Soccer League ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener459 U.S. 1074
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “National Football League v. North American Soccer League” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Partee v. San Diego Chargers Football Co. ↗California Supreme Court · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener668 P.2d 674, 34 Cal. 3d 378, 194 Cal. Rptr. 367, 1983 Cal. LEXIS 223
U.S. government work
Credit
California Supreme Court, “Partee v. San Diego Chargers Football Co.” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Rudolph v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd. ↗District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener447 So. 2d 284
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court of Appeal of Florida, “Rudolph v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Scallen v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc. ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983 · Court opinion · CourtListener574 F. Supp. 278, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 189, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15007
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Scallen v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc.” (1983). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982 · Court opinion · CourtListener550 F. Supp. 558, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16653
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League” (1982). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
North American Soccer League v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982 · Court opinion · CourtListener670 F.2d 1249, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22278
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “North American Soccer League v. National Football League” (1982). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Wtwv, Inc. v. National Football League and Miami Dolphins, Ltd. ↗Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982 · Court opinion · CourtListener678 F.2d 142, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18483
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, “Wtwv, Inc. v. National Football League and Miami Dolphins, Ltd.” (1982). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Colorado High School Activities Ass'n v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Colorado · 1981 · Court opinion · CourtListener524 F. Supp. 60, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15248
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Colorado, “Colorado High School Activities Ass'n v. National Football League” (1981). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League ↗District Court, C.D. California · 1981 · Court opinion · CourtListener519 F. Supp. 581, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15152
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, C.D. California, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League” (1981). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Smith v. Pro-Football, Inc. ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 1981 · Court opinion · CourtListener528 F. Supp. 1266, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16560
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Smith v. Pro-Football, Inc.” (1981). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League ↗District Court, C.D. California · 1980 · Court opinion · CourtListener484 F. Supp. 1274, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11599
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, C.D. California, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League” (1980). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association Baltimore Football Club, Inc. Buffalo Bills, Inc. Chargers Football Company Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. Cincinatti Bengals, Inc. Cleveland Browns, Inc. Etc., Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commis ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980 · Court opinion · CourtListener634 F.2d 1197
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association Baltimore Football Club, Inc. Buffalo Bills, Inc. Chargers Football Company Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. Cincinatti Bengals, Inc. Cleveland Browns, Inc. Etc., Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commis” (1980). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
North American Soccer League v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1980 · Court opinion · CourtListener505 F. Supp. 659, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15038
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “North American Soccer League v. National Football League” (1980). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979 · Court opinion · CourtListener595 F.2d 1265, 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2537, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16338
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football League” (1979). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hayes v. National Football League ↗District Court, C.D. California · 1979 · Court opinion · CourtListener469 F. Supp. 247, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12784
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, C.D. California, “Hayes v. National Football League” (1979). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
James McCoy (Yazoo) Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., a Maryland Corporation, A/K/A Washington Redskins and the National Football League, (Two Cases) ↗Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979 · Court opinion · CourtListener593 F.2d 1173, 193 U.S. App. D.C. 19
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, “James McCoy (Yazoo) Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., a Maryland Corporation, A/K/A Washington Redskins and the National Football League, (Two Cases)” (1979). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League ↗District Court, C.D. California · 1979 · Court opinion · CourtListener468 F. Supp. 154
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, C.D. California, “Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League” (1979). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
North American Soccer League v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1979 · Court opinion · CourtListener465 F. Supp. 665, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14323
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “North American Soccer League v. National Football League” (1979). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Jack Reynolds v. National Football League, Charles Young v. National Football League, Marvin Crenshaw v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978 · Court opinion · CourtListener584 F.2d 280
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “Jack Reynolds v. National Football League, Charles Young v. National Football League, Marvin Crenshaw v. National Football League” (1978). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Joseph R. Kapp v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Joseph R. Kapp v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Joseph R. Kapp v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978 · Court opinion · CourtListener586 F.2d 644
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Joseph R. Kapp v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Joseph R. Kapp v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Joseph R. Kapp v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association” (1978). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Kapp v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978 · Court opinion · CourtListener586 F.2d 644
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “Kapp v. National Football League” (1978). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Rivers v. New York Jets ↗District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978 · Court opinion · CourtListener460 F. Supp. 1233
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Missouri, “Rivers v. New York Jets” (1978). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Brinkman v. BUFFALO BILLS FOOTBALL CLUB, ETC. ↗District Court, W.D. New York · 1977 · Court opinion · CourtListener433 F. Supp. 699, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14991
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, W.D. New York, “Brinkman v. BUFFALO BILLS FOOTBALL CLUB, ETC.” (1977). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles Football Club ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977 · Court opinion · CourtListener431 F. Supp. 254, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16327
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles Football Club” (1977). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc. ↗Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977 · Court opinion · CourtListener187 U.S. App. D.C. 73, 570 F.2d 982, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5556
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, “Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.” (1977). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League v. Governor of the Delaware ↗District Court, D. Delaware · 1977 · Court opinion · CourtListener435 F. Supp. 1372
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Delaware, “National Football League v. Governor of the Delaware” (1977). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976 · Court opinion · CourtListener407 F. Supp. 717, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17189
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Chuy v. Philadelphia Eagles” (1976). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
John MacKey v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976 · Court opinion · CourtListener543 F.2d 606
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “John MacKey v. National Football League” (1976). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Smith v. Pro-Football ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 1976 · Court opinion · CourtListener420 F. Supp. 738, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13323
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Smith v. Pro-Football” (1976). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Bowman v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1975 · Court opinion · CourtListener402 F. Supp. 754
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “Bowman v. National Football League” (1975). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
MacKey v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Minnesota · 1975 · Court opinion · CourtListener407 F. Supp. 1000
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Minnesota, “MacKey v. National Football League” (1975). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. v. Bergey ↗District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974 · Court opinion · CourtListener453 F. Supp. 129, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8543
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. Ohio, “Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. v. Bergey” (1974). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Kapp v. National Football League ↗District Court, N.D. California · 1974 · Court opinion · CourtListener390 F. Supp. 73, 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. California, “Kapp v. National Football League” (1974). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Matuszak v. Houston Oilers, Inc. ↗Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974 · Court opinion · CourtListener515 S.W.2d 725, 1974 Tex. App. LEXIS 2719
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals of Texas, “Matuszak v. Houston Oilers, Inc.” (1974). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
National Football League Players Association v. National Labor Relations Board, and National Football League Management Council, Intervenor ↗Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974 · Court opinion · CourtListener503 F.2d 12
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, “National Football League Players Association v. National Labor Relations Board, and National Football League Management Council, Intervenor” (1974). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Beach v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1971 · Court opinion · CourtListener331 F. Supp. 249, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7518
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “Beach v. National Football League” (1971). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Campo v. National Football League ↗District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971 · Court opinion · CourtListener334 F. Supp. 1181, 1972 Trade Cas. (CCH) 73,805
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Louisiana, “Campo v. National Football League” (1971). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Management Television Systems, Inc. v. National Football League ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971 · Court opinion · CourtListener52 F.R.D. 162, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1369
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “Management Television Systems, Inc. v. National Football League” (1971). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'n ↗District Court, N.D. California · 1970 · Court opinion · CourtListener314 F. Supp. 1057, 1971 Trade Cas. (CCH) 73,397, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11047
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, N.D. California, “California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'n” (1970). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Charles T. Hennigan v. Chargers Football Company, a Partnership, D/B/A the San Diego Chargers, and Eugene v. Klein and Samuel Schulman, General Partners in That Partnership, and Third-Party v. Houston Oilers, Inc., Third-Party ↗Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970 · Court opinion · CourtListener431 F.2d 308, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7984
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, “Charles T. Hennigan v. Chargers Football Company, a Partnership, D/B/A the San Diego Chargers, and Eugene v. Klein and Samuel Schulman, General Partners in That Partnership, and Third-Party v. Houston Oilers, Inc., Third-Party” (1970). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc. ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 1970 · Court opinion · CourtListener312 F. Supp. 472, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12049, 1970 Trade Cas. (CCH) 73,170
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.” (1970). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hennigan v. Chargers Football Co. ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970 · Court opinion · CourtListener431 F.2d 308
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Hennigan v. Chargers Football Co.” (1970). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc. ↗District Court, District of Columbia · 1969 · Court opinion · CourtListener46 F.R.D. 605, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1123, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12484, 1969 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,834
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, District of Columbia, “Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.” (1969). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Faison ↗District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969 · Court opinion · CourtListener217 So. 2d 841, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6388
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court of Appeal of Florida, “Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Faison” (1969). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Houston Oilers, Inc. v. Ralph Neely ↗Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966 · Court opinion · CourtListener361 F.2d 36
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, “Houston Oilers, Inc. v. Ralph Neely” (1966). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Football League v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963 · Court opinion · CourtListener323 F.2d 124, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4163, 1963 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,903
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, “American Football League v. National Football League” (1963). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Football League v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Maryland · 1962 · Court opinion · CourtListener205 F. Supp. 60, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4882, 1962 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,334
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Maryland, “American Football League v. National Football League” (1962). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Blaich v. National Football League ↗District Court, S.D. New York · 1962 · Court opinion · CourtListener212 F. Supp. 319, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5413, 1963 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,631
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. New York, “Blaich v. National Football League” (1962). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
American Football League v. National Football League ↗District Court, D. Maryland · 1961 · Court opinion · CourtListener27 F.R.D. 264, 4 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 38, 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5855, 1961 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,959
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, D. Maryland, “American Football League v. National Football League” (1961). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. Harris ↗Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961 · Court opinion · CourtListener348 S.W.2d 37, 1961 Tex. App. LEXIS 1769
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals of Texas, “Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. Harris” (1961). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
United States v. National Football League ↗District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961 · Court opinion · CourtListener196 F. Supp. 445, 1961 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,082, 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5184
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, “United States v. National Football League” (1961). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Detroit Football Company v. John Robinson ↗Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960 · Court opinion · CourtListener283 F.2d 657, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3334
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, “Detroit Football Company v. John Robinson” (1960). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Detroit Football Company v. Robinson ↗District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960 · Court opinion · CourtListener186 F. Supp. 933, 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3480
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, E.D. Louisiana, “Detroit Football Company v. Robinson” (1960). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Los Angeles Rams Football Club v. Cannon ↗District Court, S.D. California · 1960 · Court opinion · CourtListener185 F. Supp. 717, 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3547
U.S. government work
Credit
District Court, S.D. California, “Los Angeles Rams Football Club v. Cannon” (1960). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Radovich v. National Football League ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 1957 · Court opinion · CourtListener1 L. Ed. 2d 456, 77 S. Ct. 390, 352 U.S. 445, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1749
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “Radovich v. National Football League” (1957). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Radovich v. NFL ↗Supreme Court of the United States · 1957 · GovInfoEarly professional-football antitrust history and the limits of the baseball exemption.
U.S. government work
Credit
Supreme Court of the United States, “Radovich v. NFL” (1957). GovInfo. U.S. government work.
A work of the U.S. government: not under copyright in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
William Radovich v. National Football League ↗Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956 · Court opinion · CourtListener231 F.2d 620, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5321, 1956 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,303
U.S. government work
Credit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, “William Radovich v. National Football League” (1956). CourtListener. U.S. government work.
A U.S. court opinion: the opinion's words are not under copyright. The licence or statement ↗
Official Alberta Rugby Union: Varsity vs Eskimos, Renfrew Park,November 2, 1929 ↗University of Alberta · 1929 · Book · Internet Archive-
U.S. public domain
Credit
University of Alberta, “Official Alberta Rugby Union: Varsity vs Eskimos, Renfrew Park,November 2, 1929” (1929). Internet Archive. U.S. public domain.
Published in 1929: public domain in the U.S. The licence or statement ↗
Portrait of College Football Team, The "Pirates," in Partial Uniform, and with Man in Business Suit 1879 ↗John N. Choate · 1879 · Picture · Wikimedia CommonsPortrait of College Football Team, The "Pirates," in Partial Uniform, and with Man in Business Suit 1879.
U.S. public domain
Credit
John N. Choate, “Portrait of College Football Team, The "Pirates," in Partial Uniform, and with Man in Business Suit 1879” (1879). Wikimedia Commons. U.S. public domain.
Public domain in the U.S., as its source marks it. The licence or statement ↗

Each work's rights are checked on their own before it goes on a shelf, and each one carries its credit. Something here that shouldn't be? Contact, copyright and takedown.

Business, law and broadcasting

Read here

The whole shelf

Walk the room.

Command Deck

Add TLT to Your Phone

Search The Late Thirds

Ball Knowledge